Public Health
NICEATM-ICCVAM Home >> Test Method Evaluations >> Immunotoxicity >> Use of the LLNA for Potency Categorization

Use of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay for Potency Categorization of Chemicals Causing Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans

Site Map
Site Map
Overview and Recommendations Peer Review Panel
Test Method Evaluation Report

Overview and Recommendations

The murine local lymph node assay (LLNA) is a stand-alone test method for assessing the hazard potential of a test substance to induce allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). ICCVAM evaluated the use of the LLNA for potency categorization of chemicals causing ACD in humans. ICCVAM concluded that the LLNA can be used to categorize substances as strong sensitizers (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals Subcategory 1A). However, substances that are not identified as strong sensitizers using the LLNA require additional information to categorize them as other than strong sensitizers (Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals Subcategory 1B). Strong sensitizers are those substances considered to have a significant potential for causing hypersensitivity.

See below for letters to Federal agencies communicating ICCVAM recommendations and agency responses

Background

For over 10 years, the LLNA has been accepted worldwide as a valid alternative to traditionally accepted guinea pig test methods for assessing ACD hazard potential for most testing situations. However, the use of the LLNA has been limited to a “yes/no” determination of whether or not a substance has the potential to cause ACD in humans.

Cover of the ICCVAM LLNA Potency Test Method Evaluation Report

In January 2007, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) requested that NICEATM and ICCVAM assess the validation status of the LLNA as a stand-alone test method to classify potentially skin-sensitizing chemicals according to potency. The CPSC, under the Federal Hazardous Substances Act, currently only requires products that are considered to be strong skin sensitizers to carry hazard labeling warning of ACD hazard potential. Results from tests that could be used to identify potential strong human skin sensitizers would be helpful for the purposes of hazard identification for CPSC and other agencies with an interest in identifying strong skin sensitizers.

Accordingly, NICEATM and ICCVAM evaluated the extent that LLNA results could be used to correctly predict “strong” versus “other than strong” human skin sensitizers. The ICCVAM interagency Immunotoxicity Working Group (IWG), working with NICEATM, prepared a draft background review document (BRD) and draft recommendations for use of the LLNA for potency categorization of chemicals that cause ACD in humans.

The draft BRD and draft ICCVAM recommendations were reviewed in a public meeting of an international independent scientific peer review panel in March 2008. The peer review panel agreed with ICCVAM that the LLNA can be used as part of a weight-of-evidence evaluation for categorizing skin sensitizers based on potency, although it should not be used as a stand-alone test method for this purpose. The peer review panel also recommended that NICEATM perform additional analyses using alternative approaches that might provide more appropriate thresholds for the human reference data for evaluating the use of the LLNA for potency categorization of human skin sensitizers.

The final ICCVAM recommendations stating that the LLNA can be used to categorize substances as strong sensitizers are included in the ICCVAM Test Method Evaluation Report: Usefulness and Limitations of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay for Potency Categorization of Chemicals Causing Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans. The test method evaluation report also includes an updated ICCVAM-recommended protocol for the LLNA and recommendations for future studies to further evaluate the usefulness and limitations of the LLNA for potency determinations. The final BRD, including the data and analyses on which the recommendations are based, is included as an appendix to the test method evaluation report.

View publications and presentations on NICEATM-ICCVAM evaluations of the murine local lymph node assay for identification and classification of sensitizers

Federal Register Notices

Report and Recommendations on the Usefulness and Limitations of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay for Potency Categorization of Chemicals Causing Allergic Contact Dermatitis in Humans (76 FR 18639, July 28, 2011) [PDF]

Peer Review Panel Report on the Validation Status of New Versions and Applications of the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA): A Test Method for Assessing the Allergic Contact Dermatitis Potential of Chemicals and Products: Notice of Availability and Request for Public Comments (73 FR 29136, May 20, 2008) [PDF]

Announcement of an Independent Scientific Peer Review Panel Meeting on the Murine Local Lymph Node Assay; Availability of Draft Background Review Documents; Request for Comments (73 FR 1360, January 8, 2008) [PDF]
View public comments received in response to notice


Transmittal of Recommendations to Federal Agencies

  • Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Thomas R. Frieden, M.D., M.P.H., Director, Centers for Disease Control, and Administrator, ATSDR [PDF]
    • Response from Christopher J. Portier, Ph.D., Director, National Center for Environmental Health and ATSDR (received January 5, 2012) [PDF]

  • Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Inez Moore Tenenbaum, Chairman, CPSC [PDF]
    • Response from Todd Stevenson, Office of the Secretary (received February 7, 2012) [PDF]

  • Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Lisa P. Jackson, Administrator, EPA [PDF]
    • Response from John Fowle, Ph.D., DABT, Office of Pesticide Programs (received January 6, 2012) [PDF]

  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Margaret Hamburg, M.D., Commissioner [PDF]
    • Response from Jesse L. Goodman, M.D., M.P.H. , Chief Scientist and Deputy Commissioner (Acting) for Science and Public Health (received January 6, 2012) [PDF]

  • National Cancer Institute (NCI)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Harold Varmus, M.D., Director, NCI [PDF]
    • Response from Dr. Varmus (received July 15, 2011) [PDF]

  • National Institutes of Health (NIH)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Francis S. Collins, M.D., Ph.D., Director, NIH [PDF]
    • Response from Dr. Collins (received December 12, 2011) [PDF]

  • National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS)
    • Letter from Linda Birnbaum, Ph.D., DABT, ATS, Director, NIEHS, to the ICCVAM Committee (August 5, 2011) [PDF]

  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to John Howard, M.D., Director, NIOSH [PDF]
    • Response from Dr. Howard (received November 8, 2011) [PDF]

  • National Library of Medicine (NLM)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Donald A.B. Lindberg, M.D., Director, NLM [PDF]
    • Response from Dr. Lindberg (received December 15, 2011) [PDF]

  • Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA)
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to David Michaels, Ph.D., M.P.H., Assistant Secretary of Labor for Occupational Safety and Health, OSHA [PDF]
    • Response from Dr. Michaels (received December 13, 2011) [PDF]

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Tom Vilsack, Secretary of Agriculture [PDF]
    • Response from Jose Diez, Associate Deputy Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (received July 18, 2011) [PDF]

  • U.S. Department of Defense
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Leon E. Panetta, Secretary of Defense [PDF]
    • Response from Patrick Mason, Ph.D., SES, Director, Human Performance, Training, and BioSystems (received December 16, 2011) [PDF]

  • U.S. Department of Energy
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Steven Chu, Secretary of Energy [PDF]
    • Response from Dr. Michael Kuperberg, Office of Biological and Environmental Research (received October 31, 2011) [PDF]

  • U.S. Department of the Interior
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Ken Salazar, Secretary of the Interior [PDF]
    • Response from David Russ, Regional Executive, Northeast Area, U.S. Geological Survey (received January 10, 2012) [PDF]

  • U.S. Department of Transportation
    • Letter from Dr. Birnbaum to Ray LaHood, Secretary of Transportation [PDF]
    • Response from Cynthia Quarterman, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (received December 20, 2011) [PDF]

  Back to Top NICEATM-ICCVAM:
Advancing Public Health and Animal Welfare
USA.gov is the U.S. government's official web portal to all federal, state, and local government web resources and services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The NTP is located at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health.