Public Health
NICEATM-ICCVAM Home >> Test Method Evaluations >> Ocular Toxicity >> Using Fewer Animals to Identify Chemical Eye Hazards

Using Fewer Animals to Identify Chemical Eye Hazards: Revised Criteria Necessary to Maintain Equivalent Hazard Classification

Site Map
Site Map

ICCVAM is proposing eye hazard classification criteria that will provide the same or greater level of eye hazard classification as current U.S. Federal Hazardous Substances Act (FHSA) regulations, while using 50% to 83% fewer animals. The draft recommendations are based on an analysis conducted in collaboration with NICEATM. The analysis shows that using a classification criterion of at least one positive animal in a 3-animal test to identify eye hazards will provide the same or greater level of eye hazard classification as current FHSA regulations, which require the use of 6 to 18 animals. A manuscript describing the NICEATM analysis has been published in the journal Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. A Federal Register notice published in August 2011 announced availability of the draft recommendations and opportunity for public comments. ICCVAM will consider all public comments and comments made by the Scientific Advisory Committee on Alternative Toxicological Methods (SACATM) when finalizing its recommendations. Final ICCVAM recommendations will be made available on this page and forwarded to relevant Federal agencies for their consideration.

Reference:
Haseman JK, Allen DG, Lipscomb EA, Truax JF, Stokes WS. 2011. Using fewer animals to identify chemical eye hazards: revised criteria necessary to maintain equivalent hazard classification. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol.
View publication PDF [PDF]
View article online

View ICCVAM draft recommendations [PDF]

View Federal Register notice announcing availability of ICCVAM draft recommendations (76 FR 50220, August 12, 2011) [PDF]

View January 24, 2011, CPSC request for a data analysis in support of revised classification criteria necessary to maintain equivalent eye hazard labeling when using fewer animals [PDF]

Background

Current FHSA regulations provide procedures to determine the eye hazard classification and labeling requirements for chemicals and products to which consumers may be exposed. The current procedure requires a minimum of 6 animals per test and may require up to 3 sequential tests for each substance, thus requiring 6, 12, or 18 animals to reach a hazard classification decision. The requirement for second and third sequential tests is based on the number of positive responses in the previous test.

Procedures for using 3-animal tests are described in test guidelines issued by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD Test Guideline 405) and by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (OPPTS 870.2400). U.S. policies and regulations require that only the minimum number of animals necessary to obtain scientifically valid results should be used and that a rationale for the appropriateness of the number of animals used be provided. Thus, most in vivo ocular safety testing is expected to adhere to these 3-animal procedures. However, current FHSA regulations do not provide hazard classification criteria for results obtained from a 3-animal test.

NICEATM conducted an analysis to determine classification criteria based on results from a 3-animal test that would provide eye hazard classification equivalent to procedures in current FHSA regulations. Based on these results, ICCVAM developed draft recommendations to use this classification criterion for ocular safety testing procedures that use a only maximum of 3 animals per test substance.


  Back to Top NICEATM-ICCVAM:
Advancing Public Health and Animal Welfare
USA.gov is the U.S. government's official web portal to all federal, state, and local government web resources and services U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
The NTP is located at the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences, part of the National Institutes of Health.